Our Editorial Standards
At Dietcoach Schedule, we are committed to delivering accurate, evidence-based nutrition information you can trust. This page outlines our publishing principles, fact-checking processes, and commitment to editorial integrity.
The information on this site is for educational purposes only and does not constitute medical advice. Always consult a qualified healthcare professional before making health decisions.
Our Publishing Principles
Five core commitments that guide every article we publish
Evidence-Based
All nutrition information is grounded in peer-reviewed research, scientific studies, and expert consensus. We cite our sources transparently.
Fact-Checked
Every article undergoes rigorous fact-checking before publication. Our editorial team verifies claims, data, and recommendations against authoritative sources.
Transparent Disclosures
We clearly disclose conflicts of interest, partnerships, and any potential biases. Our readers deserve to know the full context behind our content.
Updated Regularly
As nutrition science evolves, we update existing articles to reflect the latest evidence. Publication dates and update notices are always visible.
Expert Authors
All content is written or reviewed by nutrition experts with relevant credentials. Author expertise and background are disclosed with every piece.
Our Fact-Checking Process
A rigorous multi-step approach to ensure accuracy
Research & Source Collection
Authors gather information from peer-reviewed journals, systematic reviews, and established health organizations. All sources are documented and verified for credibility.
Editorial Review
Our editorial team reviews the draft for clarity, accuracy, and alignment with our standards. We cross-reference claims against multiple authoritative sources.
Expert Verification
Articles involving specific nutrition topics are reviewed by subject-matter experts to confirm accuracy. This step catches nuances and context that general review might miss.
Publication & Ongoing Updates
Once approved, the article is published with clear attribution and date stamps. We monitor research and update articles when new evidence emerges that changes our recommendations.
Our Editorial Team
Experienced nutrition professionals who oversee our content
Sarah Müller
Editor-in-Chief
Sarah holds a degree in Nutritional Science and has led editorial content development for nutrition platforms across Europe for eight years. She ensures all articles meet our evidence-based standards and maintains our commitment to reader transparency.
Klaus Weber
Research Editor
Dr. Weber specializes in evaluating peer-reviewed nutrition research. He reviews all scientific claims and ensures our content reflects current evidence. His background in clinical nutrition research brings depth to our fact-checking process.
Anna Schneider
Managing Editor
Anna oversees the day-to-day editorial workflow and coordinates between writers, fact-checkers, and subject experts. She manages publication schedules and correction procedures to ensure timely and accurate content delivery.
Corrections & Transparency
Our Correction Policy
We take accuracy seriously. If you identify an error in our content—whether factual, scientific, or typographical—we welcome your feedback. Errors will be corrected promptly, and corrections will be clearly noted with a timestamp.
How we handle corrections: When an error is identified and verified, we update the article immediately. A correction note appears at the top or bottom of the article explaining what was changed and why. We do not silently edit articles without notification.
Significant corrections: If an error substantially changes the meaning or safety of the information, we may issue a separate correction notice or alert to readers who engaged with the original version.
To report an error, please contact our editorial team with specific details about the inaccuracy. Email: [email protected]
Author Credentials & Disclosures
Every article clearly identifies the author and lists relevant qualifications. Authors may include nutrition specialists, health writers with subject expertise, and other professionals whose background is disclosed.
Conflict of interest: We maintain transparent disclosure of any financial relationships, affiliations, or personal interests that could influence content. If an author has a relationship with a nutrition brand or organization, this is stated clearly.
Expertise standards: Content on specialized nutrition topics is authored or reviewed by individuals with relevant credentials. General health and wellness content is written by experienced health communicators familiar with nutrition science.
Source Attribution & References
Our articles include references to the sources we cite. Where possible, we link to peer-reviewed studies, government health resources, and established scientific organizations. Links are checked periodically to ensure they remain current.
Types of sources we prioritize: Peer-reviewed journals, systematic reviews and meta-analyses, government health agencies, established professional organizations, and expert consensus statements. We avoid relying solely on marketing materials or single small studies.
How we handle evolving research: Nutrition science evolves. When new research contradicts older guidance, we update articles and explain the shift. We do not ignore evidence simply because it contradicts previous recommendations.
Additional Editorial Standards
Balanced Perspective
Where legitimate scientific debate exists, we present multiple evidence-based viewpoints rather than claiming absolute certainty. We acknowledge areas of genuine uncertainty in nutrition science.
Plain Language
Complex nutrition science is explained in accessible language without sacrificing accuracy. We define technical terms and avoid jargon that might confuse readers while maintaining scientific precision.
Individual Variation Acknowledgment
We recognize that nutrition needs vary by person. Our content explains general principles while noting that individual health needs should be addressed with qualified professionals who know the complete health picture.
Scope & Disclaimers
Our content provides information and education. We clearly state that it is not a substitute for personalized advice or professional consultation. Each article includes appropriate disclaimers about its scope and intended use.
Regular Audits & Improvement
We periodically audit our published content to ensure continued accuracy and alignment with updated evidence. Feedback from readers and experts helps us improve our editorial processes.
Questions About Our Standards?
We value reader feedback about our editorial practices and content. If you have questions, concerns, or suggestions about how we approach nutrition information, please reach out to our editorial team.
Contact Our Editorial TeamThese editorial standards align with general best practices in health communication. For our complete legal disclaimers and terms, please review our Disclaimer and Privacy Policy.